Loading...
| by Charlie Kelly | 0
Bankers provide digital tools to their customers, but many community bank CEO’s and even most “Digital Experts” from large financial technology organizations struggle to answer two questions related to their digital users:
“What incremental revenue does an engaged digital user bring me?”
and
“What does an engaged digital user cost me?”
If you want to determine an ROI for each active digital user you recruit, it may help to have a better understanding of the two sides of the equation- how to quantify the revenue and the cost of each digital user.
Throughout this piece, we will try to get bankers thinking about the questions to ask when deciding what a digital user is worth to your bottom line.
A recent McKinsey study suggests that the number of “channels” a customer uses from your financial institution to access their money has a direct correlation to both the number of products they purchase, and the revenue per customer. The number of products purchased increased from 5 on average for the less engaged customer up to 9 products for the most engaged customer. The revenue per customer the study used was $100 per customer for a single channel (less engaged) customer, and $210 per customer for a client that used 3 or more channels. So, $110 in incremental value for an engaged customer vs. non-engaged customer.
We have seen other studies that suggest the incremental value of the digital customer is somewhere between $75-$200 per customer. Oddly, we have yet to find an expert to show us how they calculate the value of the engaged digital customer. The reason that they may not want to commit to the secret sauce behind their estimates is because there are so many variables in this equation. The two most obvious might be:
Let’s look at some revenue drivers a bank could use to calculate the value of a digital user. For the purposes of this argument, let’s ignore loans and use just the value of a deposit account for an active digital user. When we build a model for a client, we start with three revenue and one expense reduction driver:
A bank might be better to use their own customer transaction and revenue estimates rather than mine, since the “expert” opinions on the monthly value of each vary significantly. And these are meant to be gross numbers, they do not net out expenses such as the incentives you are paying your team to bring in new business.
But, if we use these numbers we come to an estimated $13 per user per month for the deposit relationship. If you multiply that number times 4 incremental products for an engaged user, and you are at $52 per month in gross revenue. Most loan products generate more income than a deposit account, so you can see where an incremental value of $75-$200 might be coming from.
Not a perfect science by any means but perhaps a framework you can use to plug in your own assumptions while validating how much a digital strategy means when growing your bank.
Now let us look at the direct cost side of the equation. Your vendor invoices will give you the direct vendor costs-per-user you currently pay but consider using incremental costs only. By which I mean that every user these days will require a core account, ecommerce, and a mobile application. Those are must-haves that you pay for regardless, so you might ignore when thinking about digital power users. Now look at tools like direct deposit, estatements, bill payment and mobile capture. The use of these tools is what separates a truly active digital primary account user from a laggard. You can consider them incremental as they drive more cost with each power user and are likely not used by someone who just parks a laggard account with your bank.
Divide these by the price you pay each month for these incremental tools by the number of active primary checking account holders, and you will come up with a cost-per-primary-account holder per month. For simplicity sake, you could use checking accounts with an active direct deposit as your divisor.
After running this analysis quite a few times, perhaps the best advice I can provide is to build yourself a model with both the revenue and expense assumptions that your team is comfortable with and use that as a baseline to make decisions. This type of a model can help you decide in what tools to invest in, and once you dig out all the numbers you need for the analysis, it can also help you develop a baseline for your internal digital guru to use to decide how you want to grow the user base going forward. It can become a great strategy planning tool. Do everything you can to negotiate your technology expense, and it will improve your ratios.
The evidence strongly suggests that large banks are well ahead of their community bank counterparts when it comes to active digital users. Since larger banks have more customer data to analyze that suggests that they see a strong ROI in investing in digital tools. We have seen the same assumptions at Remedy Consulting when analyzing data across multiple community banks.
If you are looking for help to analyze your data, please reach out.
Charlie Kelly
Partner
Charlie manages Remedy’s Systems Selection and Outsource Advisory practices and is host of the Banktalk Podcast.
Strive or thrive? Pivoting with Strategic Planning & Economic Changes
How to figure out if your Core Software has been Sunset (without you knowing it)
Remedy Consulting helps financial institutions (FI) thrive through best-in-class fintech consulting services specializing in System Selections, Contract Negotiations, Outsourcing/In-House Advisory, Bank Mergers & Acquisitions, and FI Strategic Planning. As a trusted advisor to banks and credit unions located in Wisconsin, the Remedy Team has executed over 700 system selection and vendor negotiations since 2016. Our clients receive a cost reduction on their core vendor contracts and increased efficiency with Remedy's Price Repository. To learn more about Remedy Consulting, contact us today!
After completing one renewal on your own, it was evident that market pricing information was necessary for an effective negotiation. Remedy was able to provide that plus other contract information that made for a positive renewal. Remedy was able to achieve more than our expectations, including significantly lower rates.
Amy Johnson, COO
Dairy State Bank, Rice Lake, WI
Remedy Consulting was able to achieve much more than our expectations during our core contract negotiation including significantly lower rates and contract language that much more favorable to the bank. We were extremely impressed with the project management and professionalism shown by the Remedy Team. Highly recommended.
Walker Jordan, President
Bank of Monticello
Our organization was engaged in a negotiation with our core provider for a contract renewal. Although we were already well into the process, I made the decision to hire Remedy because I felt the negotiations were taking too long and consuming too much of my management team's time.
Josh Hoppes, CEO
Mutual Savings Association, Leavenworth, KS
We wanted to ensure our pricing and contract terms were in line with those of other financial institutions. Remedy had the tools and knowledge to help us out. The process, from beginning to end, lasted about 4 months. Remedy took care of all the negotiations and simply kept us apprised of where the negotiations were at and how they were going.
Ben Hansen, CEO
RSNB Bank, Rock Springs, WY
Cornerstone Bank thanks Remedy Consulting as a strategic partner in core contract negotiation. Brian, Project Manager, streamlined the process of our core vendor renewal and advised us as to the new technologies that we could continue/implement and still receive a cost reduction on our five-year contract. We are happy to highly recommend Brian and the Remedy Team.
John Doull, President
Cornerstone Bank, Overland Park, KS