Loading...
| by Charlie Kelly | 0
Recently, our firm assisted a client on the renewal of a core contract that could approach $130 million in total contract value if the financial institution hits its growth targets. Below are a few war stories and major hurdles that the client cleared with its vendor in order to sign this significant renewal. Although most core contracts never approach this size, there are several lessons that may help in your bank or credit union’s next major negotiation.
The first question we always ask is: “Who will ultimately approve the final deal at the vendor?”
It is very likely that the deal is not being approved by the account or sales rep with whom you are negotiating. Is it their boss, the CFO or someone else? If your deal is large enough, meet with all the vendor stakeholders at the beginning of the negotiation and again when you reach major negotiating hurdles. Discuss time frames and expectations during that meeting as well.
The second question we ask our vendor reps is: “How are you paid if this deal goes through?”
This may sound like a personal question for the account rep or sales rep, but you are not asking how much they will make. Rather, you are subtly asking what you can do to improve their motivation. Are they commissioned on new products added to the contract or some share of deal profitability? Are they paid on the total value of the contract or something like first year order value? Once you know their motivators, you can structure a deal that the salesperson can feel good about. You will also have built an internal advocate at the vendor to help you get things done behind the scenes.
Lesson: Build your negotiation strategy and aim to improve your end result by first understanding who you are negotiating with and how they are compensated at the end of the deal.
If you are renewing a contract, it helps to know what the vendor sees when they look at your contract. Are you paying at a higher or lower rate compared to other financial institutions of a similar size? If you are overpaying, you need to know that when you go into the negotiation.
This is where you may need outside help. Professional negotiators often spend a good deal of time and money building pricing databases, and this is particularly helpful when dealing with a vendor. In a previous career, I managed pricing and contracts at a large fintech company, and you can believe I had a team of analysts that built price curves and rate tables to let me know whether a deal was good or bad.
In the case of the $130 million contract, the vendor and our client had been negotiating for several months by the time we partnered with the financial institution to assist in the negotiation. The client was able to leverage our data to help decide the range it should be willing to pay for various services, and it moved the negotiation along more smoothly than the previous months. Just the realization that they had negotiated a fair deal gave both parties the confidence to move the deal to a conclusion.
Lesson: Information is power at the negotiating table.
The most important bargaining chips you have as a buyer are:
Each of these items represent new revenue that did not exist in the prior contract. It is natural that larger customers get volume discounts and so naturally pay a lower rate than their smaller counterparts. If you have grown since your previous contract, you should see a concession from the vendor for that growth.
In this negotiation, we had regular strategy sessions with the client about the right timing to offer up bargaining chips in order to gain a concession from the vendor that the client felt was important. By doing this and anticipating the vendor’s position, both parties were able to reach a win-win scenario.
Lesson: If you can determine the elements that the vendor finds the most appealing early on, you can better plan the order of your asks to improve your results.
Because this deal was so large, it had the ability to impact the financial statements of the vendor. Remember that many vendors are publicly held corporations, and their quarterly earnings are paramount. A large deal can influence a vendor’s ability to hit planned financial targets.
During our strategy sessions, we discussed with the client the impact of moves like credits and one-time fees on the vendor and the client’s own finances and how they would be amortized.
As anticipated, the final vendor request prior to concluding the contract was a significant shift in the way that discounts and credits were being offered, in order to help improve the vendor’s financials. Some of the credits became contingent on the client hitting growth targets. This put some of the credits at risk in the client’s mind. We discussed the move in our strategy discussions and were able to come up with alternative scenarios that would help the vendor achieve the same financial benefit without as much risk to the client.
Lesson: Make sure you are taking the vendor’s financial motivations into consideration as well.
Charlie Kelly
Partner
Charlie manages Remedy’s Systems Selection and Outsource Advisory practices and is host of the Banktalk Podcast.
Strive or thrive? Pivoting with Strategic Planning & Economic Changes
How to figure out if your Core Software has been Sunset (without you knowing it)
Remedy Consulting helps financial institutions (FI) thrive through best-in-class fintech consulting services specializing in System Selections, Contract Negotiations, Outsourcing/In-House Advisory, Bank Mergers & Acquisitions, and FI Strategic Planning. As a trusted advisor to banks and credit unions located in Wisconsin, the Remedy Team has executed over 700 system selection and vendor negotiations since 2016. Our clients receive a cost reduction on their core vendor contracts and increased efficiency with Remedy's Price Repository. To learn more about Remedy Consulting, contact us today!
Remedy Consulting was able to achieve much more than our expectations during our core contract negotiation including significantly lower rates and contract language that much more favorable to the bank. We were extremely impressed with the project management and professionalism shown by the Remedy Team. Highly recommended.
Walker Jordan, President
Bank of Monticello
Cornerstone Bank thanks Remedy Consulting as a strategic partner in core contract negotiation. Brian, Project Manager, streamlined the process of our core vendor renewal and advised us as to the new technologies that we could continue/implement and still receive a cost reduction on our five-year contract. We are happy to highly recommend Brian and the Remedy Team.
John Doull, President
Cornerstone Bank, Overland Park, KS
Our organization was engaged in a negotiation with our core provider for a contract renewal. Although we were already well into the process, I made the decision to hire Remedy because I felt the negotiations were taking too long and consuming too much of my management team's time.
Josh Hoppes, CEO
Mutual Savings Association, Leavenworth, KS
After completing one renewal on your own, it was evident that market pricing information was necessary for an effective negotiation. Remedy was able to provide that plus other contract information that made for a positive renewal. Remedy was able to achieve more than our expectations, including significantly lower rates.
Amy Johnson, COO
Dairy State Bank, Rice Lake, WI
We wanted to ensure our pricing and contract terms were in line with those of other financial institutions. Remedy had the tools and knowledge to help us out. The process, from beginning to end, lasted about 4 months. Remedy took care of all the negotiations and simply kept us apprised of where the negotiations were at and how they were going.
Ben Hansen, CEO
RSNB Bank, Rock Springs, WY